The EARA Conference series is a pioneering effort to bridge the gap between biomedical research and public communication. Launched in 2025, these conferences address a fundamental challenge following the worldwide shift towards openness in animal research: how should the communication strategies of the biomedical sector evolve to align with public expectations, the political landscape and media realities?  

The EARA conferences directly support our mission to ensure that animal research is understood by society as a critical component of scientific and medical progress. By bringing together researchers, welfare officers, science communicators, journalists and patient advocates, EARA creates a unique space where experts from typically disconnected fields can share insights, develop new strategies and shape the future of science communication together. 

The second EARA Conference will continue building connections between research communities, communicators and patient advocates. Further details will be announced soon, so follow us on our social media to be the first to know. 

On 6–7 November 2025, EARA held its first-ever international conference in Berlin, with the Max Delbrück Center (MDC), Charité Berlin and Tierversuche verstehen (TVV) as main partners. The meeting brought together two communities that rarely interact: biomedical researchers and science communicators. Held during Berlin Science Week, this first conference attracted over 200 participants from 23 countries. 

Conference Aims

  • Explore next steps for improving animal research communication as transparency becomes standard practice 
  • Develop practical guidelines to support institutions and individuals in public engagement 
  • Foster collaboration between researchers, welfare officers, journalists and patient advocates 
  • Address the disconnect that contributes to public misunderstanding of animal research 
“Don’t mention the A word”: The U.K. journey to openness 
layout-1

“Don’t mention the A word”: The U.K. journey to openness 

Fiona Fox, Science Media Centre, UK

2025: A Canadian Odyssey for Transparency
layout-1

2025: A Canadian Odyssey for Transparency

Lucie Côté, Research Institute – MUHC, Canada

Leading the way: Transparency to drive progress and informed exchange in animal research
layout-1

Leading the way: Transparency to drive progress and informed exchange in animal research

Susanna Louhimies, European Commission

Effective science communication and media
layout-1

Effective science communication and media

Sascha Karberg, Der Tagesspiegel, Germany

Volker Stollorz, Science Media Center, Germany

Alba Morán-Álvarez, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices, Spain

Andy Ridgway, University of the West of England, UK

Communicating ethics and legal frameworks
layout-1

Communicating ethics and legal frameworks

Athanassia Sotiropoulos, French 3R Center, France 

Stefan Hippenstiel, Charité 3R Center, Germany 

Klas Abelson, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 

Emmanuel Procyk, INSERM/EU-Simia, France

Transparency and openness in animal research
layout-1

Transparency and openness in animal research

Hannah Hobson, Understanding Animal Research, UK 

Vera Glasser, Max Delbrück Center, Germany 

Julia Biederlack, Charité Berlin, Germany 

Michaela Dinboeck, Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland 

Josep Solves, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, Spain

Hot topics in science 
layout-1

Hot topics in science 

Fiona Fox, Science Media Centre, UK 

Michael Fitzpatrick, UK 

Josef Zens, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Geoforschung, Germany

full programme book
  • Factual, accurate communication and emotions should not be treated as opposites, but intentionally balanced. 
  • It’s important that biomedical experts engage on platforms where the public gets informed to take health decisions, including new social media platforms like TikTok and AI-mediated search. 
  • Refinement, a core component of the 3Rs, remains under-communicated to public audiences. 
  • Patient advocates should be at the forefront of health research communication efforts, supported by transparent institutions. 
  • When building public understanding, dialogue consistently outperforms confrontation.