Monkeys are rarely used in research. They are only used when no other animal species is suitable, and no non-animal alternative can answer critical research questions.
There is a stringent regulatory framework in Europe under Directive 2010/63/EU that governs the care and use of monkeys (non-human primates, NHPs) in science, reflecting their high cognitive abilities and close relationship to humans. Monkeys are rarely used in research – in 2022, they accounted for only about 0.06% of animals used for scientific purposes in the EU (5,784 out of over 9,237,542 million).
They are only used when no other animal species is suitable, and no non-animal alternative can answer critical research questions. This is because, while smaller animals like mice and rats suffice for many studies, they often cannot replicate more complex human biology. Monkeys’ biological similarity to humans sometimes makes them the only viable research model for particular diseases and therapies. European and international expert reviews have concluded that in these specific cases, the limited use of monkeys remains essential, even as scientists strive for replacements.
Why are monkeys used in research?

Monkeys, closely related to humans, share similar organs, immune systems and genetics. This makes monkey studies more predictive of human outcomes. For instance, only primates have a macula, the central retina part, so monkey models are crucial for understanding and treating macular degeneration, a leading cause of vision loss.
Monkeys also naturally develop conditions like atherosclerosis, osteoporosis and hypertension, making them valuable for research on heart disease, bone health and blood pressure. Their physiology also makes them susceptible to infections similar to humans, such as HIV, enabling the development of effective antiretroviral treatments that reduce HIV/AIDS mortality.
Many modern therapies, like gene therapies and monoclonal antibodies, are highly specific to human biology. If a new drug doesn’t affect common lab animals, it must be tested in a non-rodent species. Monkeys are often the only suitable option because their receptors and immune responses are similar to those of humans. For instance, certain therapeutic antibodies only work in primates, so they must be evaluated in monkeys to ensure safety and effectiveness for humans.
Monkeys’ remarkably similar structure and function to humans make them essential for neuroscience research. They share higher cognitive functions and a well-developed cerebral cortex, allowing scientists to study brain circuits’ underlying movement, memory, vision, cognition, and psychiatric disorders in ways not possible in rodents. These studies have led to breakthroughs like deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease and the first theories of the biological basis of depression.
Which areas of research use monkeys?
Monkeys are used in a small number of crucial research areas where they provide unique insights into human health. Below, we outline some of the main fields – from infectious diseases to brain disorders – and give recent examples (from the last five years) of how monkey studies have advanced medicine.
Infectious diseases and vaccine development
Monkeys play a crucial role in understanding and combating infectious diseases that affect humans. Their immune systems are similar to ours, allowing them to respond to infections and vaccines in comparable ways. All leading COVID-19 vaccines (Moderna, Oxford/AstraZeneca, Pfizer/BioNTech and Johnson & Johnson) were tested for safety and efficacy in rhesus macaque monkeys before human trials. During the COVID-19 pandemic, monkey studies were essential to confirm that vaccine candidates could protect against the virus and were safe to use in people.
Likewise, monkeys have been key in developing vaccines or treatments for other deadly outbreaks: for example, experimental monoclonal antibody therapies for Ebola achieved 100% survival in infected monkeys, providing confidence to use them in patients.
Monkeys are also susceptible to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), a close relative of HIV, which allowed researchers to develop the combination antiretroviral therapies (ART) that have transformed HIV/AIDS from a fatal illness to a manageable condition. These are cases where no other animal model reliably replicates human disease.
As a recent U.S. National Academies expert panel emphasised, research with monkeys “is critical to [our] ability to respond adequately to public health emergencies and carry out high-impact biomedical research”. Their report warned that without enough monkeys for research, our capacity to develop life-saving vaccines and treatments for diseases like COVID-19, Ebola, polio or measles would be severely compromised.
Basic research
Reproduction research
A lesser-known area where monkeys have been invaluable is in studies of human reproduction, pregnancy and development. Because monkeys have reproductive systems and hormonal cycles very similar to ours, they have contributed to several medical advances in this field. Research with rhesus monkeys in the 20th century was critical in developing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) techniques, which have since allowed millions of people to conceive children. Monkeys were also at the heart of the discovery of the Rhesus factor in blood – the Rh factor, named after rhesus macaques, is the blood antigen that can cause complications in human pregnancies (and blood transplants). Some reproductive studies continue with monkeys to answer questions that can’t be studied in humans.
For example, in 2022 scientists created the first detailed atlas of egg cells in the primate ovary, tracking the lifetime supply of eggs in monkeys. This kind of research improves our understanding of female fertility and ovarian ageing – knowledge that could inform new treatments for infertility or menopause-related conditions.
Monkeys have been used to improve care for newborn infants. Studies in baboons (a type of NHP) helped researchers develop better strategies for ventilating premature infants’ fragile lungs, reducing lung injury in preterm newborns. Scientists have also used monkeys to study how infections during pregnancy might trigger pre-term birth, an important finding since such infections are difficult and unethical to study in pregnant women. By observing how maternal infections affected pregnancy outcomes in monkeys, researchers identified inflammatory pathways that could be targets for preventing premature labour.
Research on monkeys is, quite rightly, a particularly sensitive issue… They are used only when no other species and no alternative approach can provide the answers to questions about such conditions as Alzheimer’s, stroke, Parkinson’s, spinal injury, hormone disorders, and vaccines for HIV… In the case of monkeys, the loss to medical progress would be enormous.
How are monkeys taken care of?
Because monkeys are highly sentient, socially complex animals, their care in research settings is subject to particularly strict legal and welfare requirements. In the European Union, their housing, care and use are governed by Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, which establishes enhanced safeguards for non-human primates, including stricter project authorisation, ethical review and lifetime welfare oversight. This legislation requires that monkeys may only be used if no alternative method or less sentient species is scientifically suitable, and that their welfare is protected at every stage of life. Different species also have different care requirements.

Rhesus macaque plays with paper in the enclosure. CREDIT: BPRC, the Netherlands.
Monkeys are housed in specialised facilities designed to meet their physical, social and psychological needs. This includes social housing as the default, as most monkeys are highly social animals, with single housing permitted only where justified on welfare or veterinary grounds. Enclosures are designed with sufficient vertical space, as many primate species naturally climb, perch and rest above ground level. Housing typically includes shelves, perches, ropes and platforms, allowing animals to move freely in three dimensions.
These structures are also part of the housing enrichment as well as a range of toys and manipulable/destructible materials (for example, cardboard), alongside maintaining novelty through minor changes in furniture, feeding practices or toys. They are also encouraged to forage as they would in the wild, with scattered feeding and artificial feeding systems.

Sedated rhesus macaque during an annual health check, checking the teeth. CREDIT: BPRC, the Netherlands.
Monkeys are cared for daily by veterinarians and trained caretakers with specialist experience in primate behaviour and welfare. Staff monitor animals’ appetite, posture, movement, grooming, social interactions and behaviour as part of routine health and welfare checks. Veterinarians also play a fundamental role in Animal Welfare bodies, evaluating project procedures, project approval, welfare advice, staff training and more. This is especially relevant in non-human primates, given the high standards of animal welfare and the special care they require due to their evolved sentience.
Facilities that house and use monkeys are subject to regular inspections by national authorities, and continued authorisation depends on maintaining these high standards of housing, enrichment, veterinary care and daily welfare monitoring throughout the animals’ lifetime.
Limitations of monkeys as animal models for biomedical research
Despite their physiological and genetic similarities to humans, monkey models present several important limitations that both researchers and regulators must consider.
No animal model can perfectly reproduce human disease. Results from non-human primate (NHP) studies can only represent partial aspects of human pathology and must be integrated with data from other animal models and human studies. Differences in gene regulation, immune responses and brain processes mean that even closely related species such as macaques and marmosets cannot fully capture the complexity of human disease.
For instance, the functional disparities in immune and gene regulation limit the extent to which findings in NHPs can be generalised to humans. Similar conclusions have been drawn in studies of ageing and developmental biology where, despite the proximity of rhesus macaques and marmosets to humans and them being the best models available to study biological processes lifespan and other ageing processes, they can differ moderately or significantly.
Furthermore, important biological differences between primates and humans limit the direct translation of many findings. Variations in metabolic pathways, immune responses, and neural circuitry often produce divergent outcomes in pharmacological and behavioural studies (Haus et al., 2014). Brain architecture and neurotransmitter systems, for example, differ substantially between macaques, marmosets and humans, complicating efforts to model neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases (Kishi & Okano, 2017).
Recognising these limitations is essential for maintaining scientific transparency and upholding ethical responsibility. Monkeys should only be used in research where the expected benefits clearly outweigh the potential harms, and where equivalent insights cannot be obtained through alternative models or human-based methods.
Replacement, reduction and refinement
Replacement involves developing alternative methods to minimise animal use, especially of sentient species. Genetically altered rodent models and in vitro human-based systems — such as stem cells, organoids, organ-on-chip and other technologies — increasingly replicate aspects of human biology that once required NHP studies. The emergence of human brain organoids, for instance, has enabled researchers to investigate brain mechanisms without resorting to invasive procedures in primates.
Transgenic mice have been used to replace monkeys in oral polio vaccine safety tests. The polio vaccine utilises live attenuated virus particles, and it is essential that each batch of vaccine is tested to ensure that it is safe and does not revert to its infectious virus form on use. Monkeys possess virus receptors similar to those found in humans and were previously used for this. However, mice have now been genetically modified to express human polio receptors.
In some areas of research into brain function, the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with human volunteers has replaced the use of monkeys. TMS can be used to ‘turn off’ activity in specific areas of the brain cortex, the outer layer of the brain, temporarily and safely. This can shed light on the function of that region of the brain.
These advances reflect the scientific and ethical imperative to replace NHPs with models that are both more humane and more predictive of human outcomes.
Reduction minimises animal research use while maintaining scientific validity through study design, statistical planning and data sharing. In NHP research, institutional collaborations have become increasingly common, enabling data from individual monkeys to be shared across studies. This practice reduces the total number of animals required to reach statistically meaningful conclusions while improving reproducibility and transparency.
The increasing use of non-invasive technologies in human subjects has also reduced dependence on NHPs, namely for studying the brain more deeply, as well as capture behaviour in a more accurate way. For example, advanced imaging techniques, including positron emission tomography (PET) and high-resolution MRI, have enabled longitudinal studies in which the same animals are followed over time, reducing the total number of animals needed. These and other technological advancements have now made it possible to have high-dimensional datasets from small sample sizes, providing much more information per animal.
Refinement minimises pain and distress in NHP experiments, and advances in training methods have transformed how primates are handled in laboratories. Monkeys are now often trained to voluntarily cooperate with research procedures such as blood sampling, MRI scanning or behavioural testing, significantly reducing the need for physical restraint and chemical sedation.
Refinement extends to housing, enrichment and veterinary care. Social housing, enriched environments and cognitive stimulation reduce stereotypic behaviours and improve psychological well-being in captive primates. Improved anaesthesia and analgesia protocols, coupled with rigorous monitoring, make invasive procedures more humane. Humane endpoints, pre-determined criteria for early study termination, prevent unnecessary suffering.The majority of monkeys used in research are humanely killed as an integral part of the experimental procedures and to collect the most data possible according to the harm-benefit analysis made previously. In situations where this is not necessary for the research, or for former breeding animals or surplus stock, it may be possible to rehome the animals to legitimate sanctuaries as an alternative, which is happening more and more in research involving primates. However, monkeys should only be rehomed if the process will be truly in the best interests of the individual animals and if the new home offers a good quality of life.
Is research with monkeys ready to be phased-out?
Strict standards govern research with monkeys due to their high sentience and ethical concerns. EU legislation requires that monkeys (and any animals) may be used only if no viable non-animal method exists. If a less sentient species, like a mouse or fish, could suffice, researchers must use it. Monkeys are a last resort in biomedical research. New animal models, such as humanised transgenic rodents or pigs, may have the potential to replace the use of monkeys in some fields of research in the future, but they have not yet been established. Approved studies must adhere to stringent welfare conditions, including housing in social groups, enrichment, training and close veterinary monitoring to minimise stress.
Certain aspects of the human brain, immune system or infectious diseases cannot be studied in a petri dish or computer model with the necessary level of detail.
In terms of toxicity testing for drugs under development, monkeys are still required, since toxicity for some drugs cannot be evaluated in alternative animal species. Minipigs are increasingly being explored as an alternative to monkeys in testing certain antibody treatments and other drugs. However, there are no alternatives yet in certain drugs that require metabolic processes that are specific to primates, some drugs that act on the reproductive and neurological system and specific antibodies that bind to proteins that are only similar enough between humans and other primates. In vitro methods, including microphysiological systems such as organs-on-a-chip, cannot yet fully replace those experiments, since they cannot replicate the complexity of an intact organism. The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) opinion on the need for monkeys in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices states that the development of a timetable for phasing out the use of monkeys is currently impractical, as there are often no other available species that can help answer key questions specific to human health, and non-animal models remain far from replacing monkeys in research.
A premature ban on monkey research in regions like Europe would halt advances in disease research and undermine animal welfare. If studies on monkeys were banned in the EU, they would simply be conducted outside the EU, since regulatory authorities worldwide require them to safeguard patients who participate in clinical trials. Instead, the focus is on steadily reducing the number of monkeys used (through improved experimental design and emerging alternatives) and on refining how studies are conducted. For the foreseeable future, the ethical and careful use of non-human primates will remain essential to advancing safe solutions to human and animal diseases.
For the foreseeable future, the ethical and careful use of non-human primates will remain essential to advancing safe solutions to human and animal diseases.
The stakes could not be higher. We are witnessing revolutions in neuroscience, medicine and AI, and monkey brain research is a vital engine powering them all… If we abandon this research now, we lose knowledge that would save lives and generate immense economic opportunity.
Other useful sources
Non-human primates in research and safety testing, European Commission
Non-Human Primate Housing & Handling, The 3Rs Collaborative
Animal Welfare, German Primate Center (DPZ)
Contributions of nonhuman primate research to human health, Wisconsin National Primate Research Center
Non-human Primates, Washington University
TransparencyThursday on marmoset monkeys, Jean Laurens for EARA